What is Bush Preparing For?

Posted by Mike
Mon, 08/07/2006 - 08:35
As the congressional elections later in the year could result in the loss of Republican control of Senate and Congress, Bush is making efforts now to push through some very controversial legislation.

Federal Control of the National Guard

The National Governors Association, a bipartisan organization of American governors, has sent a letter to the House and Senate Armed Services Committees to protest an upcoming bill that would allow the federal government to usurp state control over the National Guard in "emergencies".

This bill is highly significant because, if passed, it will dramatically decrease the security of the US. It will allow the federal government to unilaterally declare an emergency and take military control over America's states.

Below is an excerpt of the NGA's letter:

A provision in section 511 of the House-passed DoD Act would allow the President to federalize the National Guard of the states without the consent of the governor. Specifically, this clause amends Title 10 of the United States Code to give the President the authority to take control of the Guard in case of "a serious natural or manmade disaster, accident, or catastrophe that occurs in the United States, its territories and possessions, or Puerto Rico."

...

The possibility of the federal government pre-empting the authority of the state or governor in natural and manmade disasters is opposed by the nation's governors.

...

We urge you to drop this provision that would usurp governor's authority over the National Guard during emergencies."

The Posse Comitatus Act

The Bush administration's push for federal military control was hinted at less than a year ago, mere months after Hurricane Katrina. In October, 2005, George W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld embarked on a short-lived media campaign against an important American law: the Posse Comitatus Act.

This federal law was passed in 1878, after the American Civil War. Its purpose was to stop federal troops from supervising elections in Confederate states. The law prohibits federally controlled units of the National Guard, and the US military in general, from acting in a local law enforcement capacity.

Bush and Rumsfeld used avian flu as the rationale for their attacks on the law. The attacks were not well received.

According to Bush:
"I'm concerned about what an avian flu outbreak could mean for the United States and the world," he told reporters during a Rose Garden news conference on Tuesday.

"One option is the use of a military that's able to plan and move," he said. "So that's why I put it on the table. I think it's an important debate for Congress to have."


Classified War Plans For Domestic Takeover

Shortly before the attacks against the Posse Comitatus Act, classified war plans, called CONPLAN 2002, had been revealed that are unlike any in US history. In these plans, the enemy is not foreign, but domestic.

A Washington Post article discusses these plans:
The war plans represent a historic shift for the Pentagon, which has been reluctant to become involved in domestic operations and is legally constrained from engaging in law enforcement.

...

But the new plans provide for what several senior officers acknowledged is the likelihood that the military will have to take charge in some situations, especially when dealing with mass-casualty attacks that could quickly overwhelm civilian resources.

The rationale for these plans to usurp local authority is not avian flu, but threats of "biological, chemical or nuclear attack".

Dealing With Insurgency and Media

If "taking charge" of the US, the Bush administration would have to concern itself with more than just formal authorities. Grass-roots insurgency and media criticism could also prove obstacles.

In the event of grass-roots insurgency, large numbers of insurgents and suspected insurgents would have to be detained. FEMA currently maintains a network of hundreds of camps (here is a video tour of one) that could be used for this purpose. In addition, a $385 million no-bid contract with KBR/Halliburton provides for building, when needed, many more camps. This sizable contract was purportedly awarded to deal with an "emergency influx of immigrants" (a reason borrowed from the Reagan-era Rex 84 program) and the need to "support the rapid development of new programs".

In the realm of media concerns, Bush has issued an executive order to replace the existing Emergency Broadcast System (EBS) with the Emergency Alert System (EAS). The purpose of the EAS is to "ensure that under all conditions the President can communicate with the American people". The order provides for command-and-control of media "through cooperation with the owners and operators of communication facilities" to "maintain, protect, and, if necessary, restore communications facilities and capabilities necessary for the public alert and warning system".

In regards to legality, the Bush government has already established that is can legally detain US citizens indefinitely, and without trial, in "wartime":
The ruling, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit, came in the case of Jose Padilla, a former gang member and U.S. citizen arrested in Chicago in 2002 and a month later designated an "enemy combatant" by President Bush. ... Padilla has been held without trial in a U.S. naval brig for more than three years.

Source: Jurist

Images: Prison Planet

Comments

qq (not verified) - Sat, 11/08/2008 - 06:09
wow power leveling:wow gold and wow power leveling
Countertops (not verified) - Wed, 10/08/2008 - 06:37
Awesome blog,real and true comments.................
Banner ads (not verified) - Wed, 10/08/2008 - 06:35
Fantastic site,appreciable work and comments.
Granite (not verified) - Wed, 10/08/2008 - 06:34
Nice blog.................
Marble (not verified) - Wed, 10/08/2008 - 06:33
Great work.................
Countertops (not verified) - Tue, 09/30/2008 - 11:43
This blog is seriously man very nice i don,t have word to write over here,comments are really true and attractive everything shown in this blog is seriously knowledgeable.
Banner ads (not verified) - Tue, 09/30/2008 - 11:40
Fantastic man its really very fantastic i love the way iti s created and i appreciate this topic,very nice.Totally true,loved it so much,keep this work going on.
Marble (not verified) - Tue, 09/30/2008 - 11:37
Great blog with nice comments i like everything over here and attract me a lot.Thanks for creating such a nice blog and maintaining it properly.
Granite (not verified) - Tue, 09/30/2008 - 11:35
AWESOME,seriously awesome blog i love to be a part of this blog very nice blog it is.
Logo Design (not verified) - Thu, 09/25/2008 - 11:38
great comments very captivating!
Cash Gifting (not verified) - Wed, 09/24/2008 - 22:45
My son is in the Guard and I think it is a bunch of bs. I don't think the bill should be passed.
Cash Gifting (not verified) - Thu, 09/11/2008 - 10:38
great article.nice done .keep it up
Sony Ericcson k800i (not verified) - Wed, 08/20/2008 - 10:59
hello this is an interesting topic....i fink that there shud be a change....dont u guys fink so...its tru that bush is afraid of war within america......still
Ice Crushers (not verified) - Tue, 08/05/2008 - 08:30
I am here to say bit what was past. I first ask something - Do you not think we’d all be speaking German or Japanese today if the US had not come to the rescue? And we pretty much single-handedly rebuilt Europe and Japan after the war – and many of those benefiting were our enemies during the war. http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm Today we give more in foreign aid $ than any other nation on the planet, and the people of the US give almost as much privately. I just cannot understand how you can think we are the bad guys. Hitler, Mussolini, Hirohito, Ceausescu, Stalin, Tito, Pol Pot, together these leaders and their people slaughtered over 170 million people and in many cases we were the ones leading the charge to stop them. DO there is a need to think over on - ARE we safe yet ? in spite of vast terror. really all this is just think or over it to react.
Anonymous (not verified) - Wed, 07/16/2008 - 03:50
To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world. 张家界旅游
张家界旅游景点
自驾游
张家界风光
户外
张家界旅游网友情连接
Anonymous (not verified) - Wed, 07/16/2008 - 03:33
To the world you may be one person, but to one person you may be the world. 张家界旅游
张家界旅游景点
自驾游
张家界风光
户外
张家界旅游网友情连接
Trevor - Poker Aficianado (not verified) - Thu, 05/22/2008 - 21:21
The consolidation of increasing power in the hands of a select few appears to be reaching new heights in this day and age. Has the process been ongoing for the past 4 or 5 decades and just reaching fruition with some many key positions occupied by the **right people** ? Hard to say, but ur analogy above, appears to ring true.
Kathy (not verified) - Tue, 01/29/2008 - 23:14
One year left of that idiot! But since it's his last he will probably continue to do major damage. Can't wait to see the list of his pardons. When this year is over we must have a major celebration to be rid of him and his veep creep!
Malcolm (not verified) - Tue, 08/15/2006 - 02:41
Good comments, Dennis. I'm at a puter terminal that will close down in less than 5 min., at the Best Western! I would like to reply when I have some time (yah, we'ze on a vacation)!
wmd0616 (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 17:46
I don't believe anyone can criticize this proposed legislation without first recanting his/her criticism of the Bush Admin's. Federal response to Katrina.
Progrocker (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 18:17
Bush's inadequate response to Katrina was due solely to his own incompetence in appointing inexperienced, arrogant cronies to crucial posts in FEMA. That, and the fact that he had sent the National Guard to invade Iraq under false pretenses. Bush deserves all the criticism that can be heaped upon him for Katrina AND for his latest attempt to turn the New World Order into reality. I thought Republicans were the party a small government? It's ironic that the Neo-Cons now believe it's okay for government to intrude into and control our lives in every way possible. Will you have the same opinion about the expansion of governmental police powers when the Democrats are in charge?
who cares (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 18:27
lets get one thing strait! bush is leading us to globle war and destruction! civil war will be the choice we have! what the fuck is happening to civilized man! what comes after that!
Andy (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 18:43
Don't you people understand? Bush is the Anti Christ or at least it looks that way! The gov with the people in power now are so inadequate and selfserving that we are in a world of GOOGOO but 50% of Americans don't know or just don't care. If I was younger I would move to Europe where at least there is some sanity!
EJ (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 18:48
Will the conservatives be on the front of the bus or the back of the bus when we all go to the concentration camps
Art (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 19:16
When people mouth off about things they don't understand. The president already has the authority to take control of the national guard. It was done repeatedly during the 60's to enforce civil rights laws. This law would just give the President the power to take control of the National Guard duing a natural disaster. Take it from someone who was at ground zero for Katrina, the biggest problem here was that Gov Bonehead didn't want to give up control of the guard and didn't want to use it appropriately. If the president wanted to use the National Guard to impose martial law, he doesn't need this law to do it.
Mark (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 19:47
"I love it... When people mouth off about things they don't understand." Even with considerable resources at its disposal, FEMA responded a week late. Blanco could have done a better job, sure, but the federal government botched the job equally. I would say that you're the one that doesn't understand. I think the opinions of the nation's governors have more weight than yours. You might want to read from the army's own web site about the importance of not allowing the federal government to take over the states' National Guards: http://www.arng.army.mil/news/public_view.asp?news_id=3020 "Recognizing the key role the militia played in the Revolution, the founding fathers ratified the militia’s continued existence by providing for its longevity in the Constitution. Control over the militia was split between the states and the federal government. The states would train the militia and appoint officers. The federal government would organize and arm the militia and determine the standard of training. The founders intentionally developed a system where military power was not monopolized by the federal government, but split with the states." You might also want to reference the words of Ben Franklin who, unlike yourself, was a great patriot: "The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt." -Ben Franklin
al (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 19:50
art this knuckle head president shouldn't be in chrge of anything. he needs to finish reading billy the goat. then go hide in a bunker, send cowardly, traitorous, chickenhawk' draft dodging george,dick and donald to iraq and bring our brave troops home.bring it on idiot
Dave G (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 19:51
It's silly to be paranoid about what Bush will do if he loses control of Congress. They already have the power to do warrantless searches, detain civilians, monitor electronic communications, subpoena 3rd party records like your credit card statement, your book club choices, etc. And all these powers were approved by the Democrats in Congress as well. Hey, wake up and smell the jack boots.
kevin (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 20:04
the only reason bush is in office is because we have more stupid people voting then anything, we didn't learn anything after his first term,I think he is so out of touch with the world that he's becoming dangerous,the republican party should be very afraid come election time because things will be so messed up by then no one will be able to fix it,that is if we survive what that stupid ass bush does before leaving office
al (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 20:08
art this knuckle head president shouldn't be in chrge of anything. he needs to finish reading billy the goat. then go hide in a bunker, send cowardly, traitorous, chickenhawk' draft dodging george,dick and donald to iraq and bring our brave troops home.bring it on idiot
V (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 20:10
people should not be afraid of their governments, governments should be afraid of their people
hthree (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 20:26
Is NOT Paranoia, Paranoia-Dave. I'm with Benjamin Franklin and Mark who quotes him in this venue. We, as an ill-informed public must do what we can to monitor this Hawk-Republican Oil Man. Thank God the Governors will not relent to this degradation of states' rights. Next, Bush will erode more of our rights in the ruse of protection.
Looney Left (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 20:48
Do the Liberals and democrats in this country have anything to say other than "Bush is evil"? I dont hear any response, plan, or other reaction to any natural disaster, war, or threat coming from the democrats other than Bush is evil, ad nauseum. Responding to disasters is not a federal responsibility. FEMAs job is to provide support AFTER the initial response of the State government. The way you idiots talk makes it sound like President Bush was standing in the Mississippi Delta flapping his arms and forming Katrina all by himself. Oh, to kill all the blacks of course, because hes a racist. Give me a break. Oh, and all this crap about the war in iraq, the war in the middle east etc.? Wake up and smell the reality morons. Make no mistake, it is a global war against militant islam. And if you think for one second you can reason, barter, appease, or otherwise "diplomatically" deal with militant islamists- you have two choices. 1) Buy yourself a koran and prayer rug and convert now, or 2) Take your chances over the next hundred years of suicide bombings and other cowardly attacks on civilians. For those of you who say the US kills civilians? Yeah, of course we do, but we dont TARGET them. Not only do the militants target civilians, but they hide behind their own civilian countrymen. Its a sad fact of war. Violence never solved anything? Violence solved HITLER, people, and its the only thing thats going to solve the current problem as well. Stop living in liberal utopian dream land where everyone gets along and get with reality.
Jon (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 21:24
Bush's plans to implement Martial Law in this country in order to control "large numbers of insurgents" etc., would be more properly applied in Iraq, where, indeed, there are large numbers of insurgents. It sounds to me as though Bush, et al are planning to declare Martial Law in the event that the Republicans loose control of congress. This sounds like Nazi Germany, 1939. What are we thinking? to allow this to happen in America, 2006. The demonstrated ineptitude of FEMA, the erosion of our civil rights, and and the rediatribution of federal resources (wealth) to administration cronies (via non-competitive Haliburton snd other contrcts) are symptomatic of the rise an incredibly greedy fascist state. When will this manipulation of our instutitions end??
sh (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 21:29
This sort of thing could never get through congress, even whith the current (as of August) makeup. Its just too far reaching, and people aren't nearly as jaded as in the first admin. when the patriot act was passed.
sh (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 21:30
This sort of thing could never get through congress, even whith the current (as of August) makeup. Its just too far reaching, and people aren't nearly as jaded as in the first admin. when the patriot act was passed.
Mark (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 21:36
I think it has already passed congress! Next stop, the senate.
depressed at stupidity... (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 21:41
I am depressed and disgusted at how everyone dismisses Bush and his cronnies as idots. These are very calculating people folks! Bush, Cheney, and the rest are pure evil and will stop at nothing until we are all on our knees...
inthemiddle (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 21:42
I am no fan of Bush and thank God he can't run again. But what scares me more is that I have never seen a bigger division between the republications and the democrats in my 50 years. Of course there have always been differences but both sides were able to work together to find solutions to the problems that face our nation that is what makes democracy work. I won't blame one party over the other as both have played a part in this growing rift. I would remind everyone however that the solutions to most problems can not be found on the right or the left but somewhere in between. We have become a selfish and angry society. Americans face some major problems both domestically and globally. I would much rather see America be the leader in finding solutions to oil dependency, global warming, AIDS, poverty etc. instead of trying to be the world police. If both parties (politicians and constituents) don't get their heads out of their asses soon....then I fear we all will lose. Think about it!
Ed Marshall (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 21:53
Art mouthed off about something he does not understand. He claims that since "The president already has the authority to take control of the national guard" such as "was done repeatedly during the 60's to enforce civil rights laws," therefore, "This law would just give the President the power to take control of the National Guard duing a natural disaster." Regardless of the artful dodgers misrepresentation of the events relating to Katrina, it does not follow that "If the president wanted to use the National Guard to impose martial law, he doesn't need this law to do it." Well, he could act without legal authorization as well as unconstitutionally. He is used to doing that. But the fact is that the Constitution, (Article I, Section 8) allows the militias (now National Guard) to be federalized to be used for only several purposes: "To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, supress Insurrections and repel Invasions" (and that doesn't mean of bird flu or West Nile Virus!) A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing when a dictator wanna be like Bush can count on citizens knowing no more than he does about the protections of their laws and Constitution. I give the artful dodger the benefit of the doubt that he knows no more than he shows.
SJB (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 22:15
This is just one more example of Republicans in charge who lost their way. The Neocons have far to much corporate control and want more control for themselves and it is costing America her liberty and security. The President should have not have this sort of control over the National Guard. Perhaps if this country stopped spending money in all the wrong places and the Federal Government stopped taking so much of our money, the states would have more ability to help themselves. I guess I was one of the dumb people who voted for President Bush, but at least I wasn't dumb enough to vote for Senator Kerry. I think congressman Ron Paul needs to run things in the White House next time.
sean (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 22:22
ben franflin also said that he who trades liberty for security will have neither don't trust any gov.ben franklin in talking about vigilance meant you must exercise all of your rights .governments must fear its citizens not the other way around. because we hold the ultimate power the power to educate ourselves,about who's in office,what they are doing,and how they are doing it.
jay Rego Menchi (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 22:31
From the lofty heights of civilization as we were taught to admire, to the dire gorges of despair and decadence as we were taught to fear. This day is on on our doorstep. Only we will only recognize the visitor when the bullet speeds through the barrel.
denny (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 22:33
You folks are dumber than a bag of rocks!!! and I'm so serious... You believe all things the Dem's and newspapers tell U cause they all know how stupid u idiots are...trust me, they love u morons... Denny and I love U to, cause I hire dumb people like u folks thanks for making me rich
sean (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 22:42
when a fly gets in your house you kill the fly,you can't possibly kill all flies everywhere and after ten years in the army i can tell you that military action on this scale does not make anything better it just acts as a recruiting poster for th likes of militant islam.our military is a sledge hammer what we need is a fly swatter,sure islam has caused deaths in this country but thats only because bush and his advisors were asleep at the wheel.and as far as bush bashing no pres. has ever bungled ,screwed up, and misread a situation more than george bush ,so when dems,or as you say liberals,don't offer a plan it's because we are still in such shock ove bush's lunacy.So here's this dems plan based on the situation bush has put us in,1) nuke all counties with islam as its religion2)nuke all countries with any one who practices islam in it.3)or take each threat singley as it comes and defeat their puny threats one at a time with the minimal collatral damage to othe nations so it becomes harder to recruit new terrorists,think it over !!!!!
Michael (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 22:54
First off as a die hard conservative Republican I say "you crying,tree hugging, faggot liberals need to shut the fuck up!" Bush is not perfect I know but at least he has the balls to go after these fucking muslim terroists. What did you expect Bush to do after 9/11? Just sit there and go "ok you fucking muslims I'll let you slide this time but don't do it again. Like Clinton did when they bombed the World Trade Center the first time and then there was the USS Cole. Clinton should of fucked their world up then but no he took no action at all. As for our troops when they joined the military they knew what they were getting into . They all chose to serve this country knowing the possibilty that they might die doing so. Like I said before I know Bush is not perfect I know he's made mistakes but he's human just like the rest of us. Nobody is perfect on God is perfect. So instead of using all your strength and breath to bitch about Bush why not pray for him instead. Pray that God will help him make the right decisions. God listens and he will answer prayers. God Bless America
Drew (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 23:07
Does anyone realize how impossible it would be for any of this bull to make it through Congress? And let's say that the impossible does happen and it gets passed through Congress. How long do you think it would take before the Supreme Court had a case front-and-center about it? Then suppose the Supreme Court doesn't act. Bush still wouldn't be able to do much more than jack. Guns and ammo are still readily available to anyone of legal age. If Bush really did try to 'take over' the U.S., he'd be facing riots more dangerous and more costly than anything seen in American history. And who among us actually thinks that American soldiers in general would turn on the people they are supposed to protect? Follow orders telling them to arrest or potentially kill innocent civilians for the sake of the President? Now you're talking about civil war. And how would the rest of the world react to such a hostile takeover? Nobody wants Iran to have nukes because its got a fundamentalist leader nearly hellbent on tearing the current world order apart at the seams. How would the rest of the Security Council feel if they found out Bush went totalitarian, with enough nukes up his sleeve to crater every mile of land on the planet? Now we're cooking with a leaking gas valve, people. Your doomsday ain't coming! Get over yourselves.
sean (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 23:11
when a fly gets in your house you kill the fly,you can't possibly kill all flies everywhere and after ten years in the army i can tell you that military action on this scale does not make anything better it just acts as a recruiting poster for th likes of militant islam.our military is a sledge hammer what we need is a fly swatter,sure islam has caused deaths in this country but thats only because bush and his advisors were asleep at the wheel.and as far as bush bashing no pres. has ever bungled ,screwed up, and misread a situation more than george bush ,so when dems,or as you say liberals,don't offer a plan it's because we are still in such shock ove bush's lunacy.So here's this dems plan based on the situation bush has put us in,1) nuke all counties with islam as its religion2)nuke all countries with any one who practices islam in it.3)or take each threat singley as it comes and defeat their puny threats one at a time with the minimal collatral damage to othe nations so it becomes harder to recruit new terrorists,think it over !!!!!
sean (not verified) - Tue, 08/08/2006 - 23:25
first, like all republicans you run around without the facts.clinton did ask the joint chiefs of staff,for a battle plan to take out the taliban and al qieada in 1996 and as a president is suppose to do he went to congress and asked permission,like tje constitution says you should do,its called advise and consent.he advised and the republican controlled congess said no using the term we are not the worlds police,that is a term that the republican's came up with any time clinton wanted to do something to stop islamists but hind sight is 20/20. oh bye the way thats a saying.also when you know as much about the world as i do and don't just think dropping a bomb on something is the answer.And as for god bless america read the bible jack ass,because in revelations god says he will lay waste to the governments of the world and bring to ruin all that have ruined his world,so I will go on hugging my tree and not believing god blesses any nation, and he especially dislikes all governments so i will see you in hell but i will be looking down on you.
2ndAmendmentGuy (not verified) - Wed, 08/09/2006 - 00:55
First you critcize President Bush and FEMA as being total incompetents, then you turn right aroung and say that there are 800 fully prepared and guarded camps ready to receive prisoners. Here's a bulletin. During my 7 years of active duty with the U.S. Army Military Police Corps, I was stationed at a number of these facilities. Here is where they stand today. Ft. McClellan Alabama (supposedly one of the FEMA run and ready prison camps) was closed 10 years ago and sold off to private interests. It's now a business park. Don't believe me? Go to the Anniston Alabama City web site and read all about it. Ft. Meade Maryland is 20 miles from my home. It is now, and always has been, essentially a post run for the purposes of training Army reserve units assigned to the Transportation Corps. In addition, the National Security Agency (NSA) is located at Ft. Meade. Now think for a second (if you still have two brain cells that work together). If you were going to lock up a bunch of subversives, would you place them next to one of your largest spy agencies thus risking the security of that agency? Come one! Get real! The premise of this entire site is so idiotic it's worse than the plots of the old Superman TV show when Clark Kent would walk up to a room and have to bend over next to the door to eavesdrop when his supposed super hearing should have let him hear the conversation clearly. Just remember this. The Second Amendment is the one that protects all of the others. With more than 500 million firearms in the hands of law abiding citizens, no such martial law takeover could ever happen. Ordinary citizens would not stand for it and the politicians know it. Rather than wasting your time on the bullshit this web site is putting out, you should support the NRA, the Second Amendment Foundation, and...go out and buy a gun and learn how to use and store it safely. A man with a GUN is a CITIZEN. A man without a GUN is a SUBJECT.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.